I first printed this neg (it was my first) in April 2009. My notes show the following:
Printed on Arista Ultra RC VC 8x10 Glossy
Dev: Arista Paper Dev 1:9 for 2'
SB: Kodak Indicator Stop Bath 1:63 for 30"
Fix: Kodafix 1:7 for 1' 30"
Test print #1: TEST PRINT: Exposed for 32-16-8-4-2-1-1
-----f/8@16" (8+4+2+1+1=16) looked good on the test print.
Print #2: f/8@16" looked dark on the whole.
Print #3: f/8@8" looked a little flat.
Print #4: f/8@12" looked really good.
And that was where I left it. I made five prints. They have held up well so I would say the process seems to be archivally a good one.
So, this time around...
Printed on Orient Seagull VC RC II 8x10 Glossy
Dev: Ilford Multigrade Paper Developer 1:9 for 1' 30"
SB: Kodak Indicator Stop Bath 1:63 for 15"
Fix: Kodafix 1:7 for 3'
Water rinse for about 10 minutes
Enlarger height: 17"
I used my stopping point as my first print of the session.
Print #1: f/8@12"
It was way too dark. Wouldn't think there would be such a difference between paper/dev combinations. So I decided to run an exposure test print to determine exposure.
Print #2: TEST PRINT: f/16. Exposed for 32-16-8-4-2-1-1
The 16" portion looked good. So I then decided to do one more test print to make certain.
Print #3: TEST PRINT: f/16. Exposed for 16-8-8
16" definitely looked the best for straight printing and a good starting point for working.
Print #4: f/16@16".
The subject looked very well. The sunlight sidelight still produced a very distracting highlight in the subject area. So I really needed to bring that highlight down so as to allow the eye to better see the rest of the face.
Prints #5,6,7: TEST PRINTS:
To bring the highlight down I decided to try pre-exposing the paper and then make the print on each paper. I flashed three sheets, one sheet for 1", another for 2" and one more for 4". The 4" pre-exposure brought the highlight down very well but darkened the subject too much to work with. Not happening. At f/16@16" the print was too dark.
Print #8: f/16@8" with 2" pre-exposure. The subject is shown very well. Still blends into the background too easily.
Print #9: f/16@8" with 2" pre-exposure and 8" dodging of the subject. This brought the background down very well and not too dramatically. I may put a burn on the lower left corner of the print area. I think that I am getting close.
So, I take a break at this point, get some food and let the prints dry for better viewing. I ask my son to look at the print as I have it. A second set of eyes can always get one through a bout with indecision. The subject looks really flat with the 2" pre-exposure. So I decide to give the 1" flash a shot. So, I take a intuitive leap and arrive at the following print.
Print#10: f/16@1" pre-exposure and then f/16@24" including a 12" dodge of the subject with an oval tool, moving it up and down vertically a couple of inches.
As a matter of fact, I was so certain I had done what I wanted, I flashed ten sheets on the spot. Then I exposed those ten sheets. Then I souped them all. And when I put the first print in the developer I realized I wanted the shadows to really be strong so I upped the time in the developer to 1' 45".
It's all broke down and the prints are hanging to dry. 8 hours of work. What a way to spend the day.
Thanks for reading.
Final print notes
TMY-2 Kodak T-Max 400
Minolta sr-T101 w/ Vivitar 28-80mm
Developed in HC110 Dil 'B' for 5' 30"
Printed on Orient Seagull VC RC II 8x10 Glossy
Dev: Ilford Multigrade Paper Developer 1:9 for 1' 45"
SB: Kodak Indicator Stop Bath 1:63 for 15"
Fix: Kodafix 1:7 for 3'
Water rinse for about 10 minutes
Enlarger height: 17"
Paper pre-exposure: f/16 @1"
Exposure: f/16 @24" including 12" dodging.
Used: Oval dodging tool, 22 sheets of paper
Prints made: 10
Post printing thoughts. With the dodging I employed, the decreased exposure of the subject is a little too pronounced for my taste. I might just have to re-visit this at some point. Definitely not finished with this one yet.
Prints made: 10
Post printing thoughts. With the dodging I employed, the decreased exposure of the subject is a little too pronounced for my taste. I might just have to re-visit this at some point. Definitely not finished with this one yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment